Tree clearance

The Warden’s Report in the Winter 2020 Magpie, mentioned that the final phase of the Acid Grassland Restoration Project would occur shortly. The article referred to a map showing the location of the work, but unfortunately the map was omitted. Many of you will now know the location without needing a map, as the trees have been felled, though not yet removed.

Snow covered acid-grassland restoration area. In the foreground there are felled silver birch. Small oaks were also cut down.

The purpose of the project is to restore areas that were for a long time acid-grassland but that have gradually become overgrown.

The ‘acid’ in acid-grassland refers to the soils, which are acidic (as opposed to alkaline, chalky soils) and lacking in nutrients. Such soils, along with grazing, result in grassland that supports many rare species of insects and plants. Mitcham Common is designated as a Site of Metropolitan Interest largely because of the biological diversity found in its acid grasslands. Without grazing, such grasslands gradually return to forest and this has been the progression on the Common.

In the Sixties, the houses on Commonside East were easily visible from the Seven Islands Pond, but in the meantime the woods have grown, firstly as low scrub, brambles and gorse, then hawthorne and then oaks, which as they grow with the protection of the hawthorn, overshadow and smother the rest. The woods expand into the remaining grasslands, their seeds spreading gradually and the woodland edge advancing.

The end state of this progression, if uninterrupted, is an oak woodland with bramble, yew and holly (and little else) underneath. Oak woodland can be lovely, of course, in as much as it is accessible. But so are grasses, smaller plants and flowers. Many birds feed among the grassy areas, for example on the insects that thrive there. Kestrels may nest in trees but they hover over grasslands and feed on small mammals found there; green woodpeckers feed not on trees but on grassland anthills (which rely on sunshine); rabbits eat grass; hedgehogs eat snails and slugs on the grasslands and inhabit the edge of the woodland; foxes eat the rabbits. Without grasslands, much is lost.

Would anyone really want a Common that lacked a variety of habitats, such as a common covered in oak woods? I doubt that many would. So what do we do to maintain variety, to preserve the Common’s special scientific status? This management dilemma has existed for decades, but the acid grasslands and all their biodiversity will disappear under gorse, brambles and trees within the next decade if nothing is done. Look closely and you will see a multitude of saplings, brambles and gorse sprouting among the grasses. The existing woods advance continually towards the pond each year.

Hopefully this helps to put the recent clearance in context for readers. Though it looks unpleasant now, it will in due course recover and help to preserve the diversity of life on the Common. Readers are welcome to comment below. Comments will appear after a delay for moderation, so please be patient.

Revision history:

Advertisement

2 thoughts on “Tree clearance

  1. The tree felling has gone too far, and the picture posted does not show some very mature oaks felled. It is of no interest to me that you could see the grassland from Commonside east in the 60’s, that was clearly over 60 years ago. You could go back even further and find evidence of woodland as well. In medieval times perhaps forest land. You cannot be selective in your choice of timeframe.

  2. With regards to sites of Metropolitan Interest and tree felling, I moved opposite Watney’s Rd 43 years ago. Then my view was a pond on the corner of Watneys and Commonside East I have always known as Arthurs Pond an ancient pond that was used as a carriage drive through, to tighten wooden wheel spokes. This pond was also an ecological delight with many frogs, toads, newts of various kinds and mixed wildfowl. This over the years has become overgrown with brush, a dumping ground and a night time haunt for drug pushers and other un-savoury types, The unkempt foliage that has been allowed to grow only assists by hiding these antics which blight what was a beautiful area. The common has been used massively this year with walkers and people taking exercise. Could this pond and surrounding area not be brought back to its rightful glory, This would benefit residents, visitors and wildlife.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s