Survey Response Summary

Bidder Memorial Revitalisation Project

Survey Response Summary

Total Responses Received: 43

Section 1: Awareness and Current Perceptions

Aware of the memorial (George Parker Bidder)?

  • Yes: 41
  • No: 1
  • Unsure: 1

Ever visited the memorial?

  • Yes: 31
  • No: 12

Current condition (if visited):

  • Excellent: 0
  • Good: 3
  • Fair: 15
  • Poor: 8
  • Very Poor: 5

Current access (if visited):

  • Easy: 0
  • Acceptable: 10
  • Difficult: 15
  • Very Difficult: 6

Importance to preserve history:

  • Very Important: 34
  • Important: 9
  • Neutral: 0
  • Not Very Important: 0
  • Unimportant: 0

Section 2: Feedback on the Revitalisation Proposal

Support for revitalising memorial:

  • Very Supportive: 36
  • Supportive: 7
  • Neutral: 0
  • Unsupportive: 0
  • Very Unsupportive: 0

Support for creating a level bark chipping path:

  • Very Supportive: 31
  • Supportive: 6
  • Neutral: 4
  • Unsupportive: 2
  • Very Unsupportive: 0

Thoughts on bark chippings for path:

  • Excellent choice: 7
  • Good choice: 21
  • Concerns about accessibility: 7
  • Prefer another surface: 8

Comments/suggestions on path surface:

: 21 with comments

Improved access would encourage more visits:

  • Yes: 33
  • No: 2
  • Unsure: 8

Potential benefits seen from this project:

  • Enhanced historical appreciation: 41
  • Improved aesthetics: 20
  • Better visitor experience: 23
  • Educational opportunities: 27
  • Increased community engagement: 23
  • Other benefits specified: 0

General comments on potential benefits:

: 15 with comments

Concerns about the proposed project:

: 23 with concerns listed

Section 3: Engagement and Support

Interested in learning more history at site:

  • Yes: 35
  • No: 2
  • Maybe: 6

Interested in attending re-dedication event:

  • Yes: 29
  • No: 0
  • Maybe: 14

Section 4: About You

Friends members who provided a name:

: 34 response(s)

Further comments or suggestions provided:

: 13 response(s)


Leave a comment