Bidder Memorial Revitalisation Project
Survey Response Summary
Total Responses Received: 43
Section 1: Awareness and Current Perceptions
Aware of the memorial (George Parker Bidder)?
- Yes: 41
- No: 1
- Unsure: 1
Ever visited the memorial?
- Yes: 31
- No: 12
Current condition (if visited):
- Excellent: 0
- Good: 3
- Fair: 15
- Poor: 8
- Very Poor: 5
Current access (if visited):
- Easy: 0
- Acceptable: 10
- Difficult: 15
- Very Difficult: 6
Importance to preserve history:
- Very Important: 34
- Important: 9
- Neutral: 0
- Not Very Important: 0
- Unimportant: 0
Section 2: Feedback on the Revitalisation Proposal
Support for revitalising memorial:
- Very Supportive: 36
- Supportive: 7
- Neutral: 0
- Unsupportive: 0
- Very Unsupportive: 0
Support for creating a level bark chipping path:
- Very Supportive: 31
- Supportive: 6
- Neutral: 4
- Unsupportive: 2
- Very Unsupportive: 0
Thoughts on bark chippings for path:
- Excellent choice: 7
- Good choice: 21
- Concerns about accessibility: 7
- Prefer another surface: 8
Comments/suggestions on path surface:
: 21 with comments
Improved access would encourage more visits:
- Yes: 33
- No: 2
- Unsure: 8
Potential benefits seen from this project:
- Enhanced historical appreciation: 41
- Improved aesthetics: 20
- Better visitor experience: 23
- Educational opportunities: 27
- Increased community engagement: 23
- Other benefits specified: 0
General comments on potential benefits:
: 15 with comments
Concerns about the proposed project:
: 23 with concerns listed
Section 3: Engagement and Support
Interested in learning more history at site:
- Yes: 35
- No: 2
- Maybe: 6
Interested in attending re-dedication event:
- Yes: 29
- No: 0
- Maybe: 14
Section 4: About You
Friends members who provided a name:
: 34 response(s)
Further comments or suggestions provided:
: 13 response(s)